<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kent Lacin Media Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lacin.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lacin.com</link>
	<description>Kent Lacin Media Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Small Diatribe on Making Art Photography</title>
		<link>http://lacin.com/2012/01/11/small-diatribe-on-making-art-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://lacin.com/2012/01/11/small-diatribe-on-making-art-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art photography photo series art photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lacin.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photographers need projects. It’s fine to just go out and shoot, but unless you have a very distinctive style (as in earth-shatteringly beautiful or original), your pictures are going to look pretty much like the next photographer’s pictures. They won’t automatically be ‘art’. This is something most shooters don’t want to hear. We all want ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Photographers need projects. It’s fine to just go out and shoot, but unless you have a very distinctive style (as in earth-shatteringly beautiful or original), your pictures are going to look pretty much like the next photographer’s pictures. They won’t automatically be ‘art’.

This is something most shooters don’t want to hear. We all want to believe that we each have a unique viewpoint and that we are equipped with magic eyes that see deeply into things.

However, most of our pictures don’t start out as art. Too much of the making of the image is done by the camera-and the camera erases our individuality when it makes the picture. It is a picture-making machine. It has very little need for us at all.
This is why it is impossible to tell much about a what the photographer contributes just by looking at one picture-too much of what you are seeing was made by the camera. And even if the image has extraordinary subject matter, it could be luck or accident that made the picture work-being in the right place at the right time. With only one image to see, it is difficult to know how much the photographer had to do with it’s creation.
Painters do not have to suffer this kind of contingency. When they put paint on a canvas, it’s art. It may be bad art, or unsightly art, but it’s art. It is undoubtedly an original creation. They create something (from scratch), whereas photographers generally take images from reality and it is only the degree to which you can see the human hand in the making of the image that makes it art.
So if you are walking around snapping pictures of what interests you, at best, you are collecting the visual ingredients that may end up becoming art.

(Small digression-there are photographers who use elaborate techniques to make their pictures interesting, such as using antique processes like the wet collodion process. The process requires very long exposures for portraits, and as a by-product, the people all look &#8216;haunted&#8217;, as they do in very old photographs. The effect is very dramatic in the first photograph, but diminishes in the second and begins to look formulaic by the third, in my opinion. This is a case where the &#8216;arty&#8217; look of a photograph ends up looking like what it is-a gimmick. Beware of arty-looking photographs!)

Where the Art is Made.
Remember, art is just a ‘way’ of describing something, so is science, so are politics. In and of itself, it doesn’t mean much and doesn’t convey much. Existence precedes it, especially with photography. When there is a lot of art and very little content, people refer to it as ‘art for art’s sake’ to indicate its diminished or narrowed importance. This is a problem primarily for painters.
Photographers, however, usually avoid this problem entirely, since they have to point their cameras at something. Something that exists. You would never hear someone say of a photograph that it is, ‘photography for photography’s sake’ which is to say, photography without content. For the most part content-less photography just doesn’t exist.
Photography is always ‘of’ something and what it is of, as Diane Arbus was fond of saying, is always far more important that what it is.
And this is why photographers need projects-something to shoot, some kind of subject matter to investigate. Remember, no great photographer was ever known for their style They were known first for their subject matter. Brassai-Paris Night Life, Arbus-Alienated People, Adams-Western Landscape, August Sander-Pre War German People, etc.
Once you have chosen a subject matter, you have a foundation like these great artists, upon which you can build something artistic. Ansel’s spectacular light effects, Brassai’s and Arbus’ confrontational light and camera angles, Cartier-Bresson’s deftness and visual complexity, they all emerge from their subject matter. Choosing your subject matter is the first step in making art. Photography is a very subject-matter based artform.
The second and final step in making art occurs when you choose (edit) your final frames from your body of work. If you do a good job choosing, your series (say, 5 pictures), people will see visual themes emerge from the set which will overarch all five of the pictures. These themes will become the skeleton of your artistic being.
So, these two steps, choosing your subject matter and choosing your final series are things only you can do, and if you do them, they will transform your photographs into art. Whether it&#8217;s good art will depend on the quality of your choices!
1/9/12]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lacin.com/2012/01/11/small-diatribe-on-making-art-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humor can be funny and is definitely better than boring</title>
		<link>http://lacin.com/2011/11/18/humor-can-be-funny-and-is-definitely-better-than-boring/</link>
		<comments>http://lacin.com/2011/11/18/humor-can-be-funny-and-is-definitely-better-than-boring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lacin.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Case 1   Evaluating your beer One of the funniest shoots we did was for Brew Your Own, a national magazine for home brewers. Our editor liked using humor to illustrate the lead story, figuring I guess, that people who make their own beer can’t be (or shouldn’t be), too serious.  In this case, the story ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-182" title="a eyeball evaluation" src="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/a-eyeball-evaluation--300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" />

<strong>Case 1   Evaluating your beer</strong>

One of the funniest shoots we did was for Brew Your Own, a national magazine for home brewers. Our editor liked using humor to illustrate the lead story, figuring I guess, that people who make their own beer can’t be (or shouldn’t be), too serious.  In this case, the story was, Evaluating Your Beer.  The topic could have been deadly boring, but with the help of the very funny actor Kurt Johnson and a hydrometer (which measures the alcoholic content of the beer) things got funny fast

By the way, these are from 120mm film; (vintage, shall we say…), so don’t evaluate the images too closely!

<a href="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/b-smug-inspection.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-183" title="b  smug inspection" src="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/b-smug-inspection-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>

We set up the shot against a white background, used a Hasselblad with a 40mm Distagon (what a great lens!), and shot very close to get some distortion. Distortion can be funny.  I gave Kurt a magnifying glass as a prop, and let him do his stuff. He was ready to evaluate.<a href="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/c-crouching-evaluation.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-184" title="c  crouching evaluation" src="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/c-crouching-evaluation-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>

I watched through the lens, and only shot when he got me actually laughing. If I weren’t feeling it, I wouldn’t shoot. I would throw out a direction, like ‘You’re astonished!’ or, ‘ You’re very picky!’ , then he would improvise. He made little whimpering sounds throughout the shoot. They were hilarious. Just imagine little whimpering sounds when you look at Kurt evaluating the beer.

<a href="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/a-eyeball-evaluation-.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-182" title="a eyeball evaluation" src="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/a-eyeball-evaluation--300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>
I am a big fan of the sub category of ‘Funny’, which is, ‘Stupid Funny’. When smart people start exaggerating, and act stupid, I start laughing.
I did very little to make these pictures funny. It was all Kurt. All I offered was encouragement, gave him all my attention and laughter and let his creative generosity take over.
<strong>Case 2 Bathing with your beer</strong>

This time, the lead story topic was even more deadly: Sterilizing your Bottles. Boring. I went outside, sat under a pear tree and started sketching. I don’t know where the idea came from but there it was: A guy in a bubble bath, naked, washing bottles.
I had just the guy-Rick Klieber (who had played one of the pirates in the movie, ‘Hook’).
I have included two pictures to show how DIFFICULT it can be to see what is funny, what ‘works’. The bottle-cleaning picture is close to what I had imagined under the pear tree…but it is not funny, it’s just strange. I shot a lot and remember trying to squeeze all the possible humor I could out of the setup. I wanted it to be funnier than it actually was.

<a href="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/4-cleaning-in-the-bathtub.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-176" title="4 cleaning in the bathtub" src="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/4-cleaning-in-the-bathtub-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a><a href="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/5-drinking-in-the-tub.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-177" title="5 drinking in the tub" src="http://lacin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/5-drinking-in-the-tub-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>

Now I can see the shot was taken from too literal an angle (you could see too much reality, not enough distortion), and the bottle brush cleaning motion was unfamiliar for people to relate to quickly. It was labored and slightly confused. Not funny.

I didn’t know what to do. Instead of getting upset, I just started playing with the situation. I mean, how often do you get a chance to shoot a great looking big guy in a bathtub with floating beer bottles? Not very often, I’ll bet.

So I went to a lower angle (sort of got in the tub with him, photographically speaking) and started getting something funny.

The lower camera angle distorts things more, giving the space some energy, the composition is better, and the way his face, his belly button and the rubber duckie line up vertically really helps keep the picture organized, with the bottles randomly floating around that definite sight line. And, his belly button actually looks ‘happy’ in this shot (to me. It may not look happy to you, I understand that) . Also, everyone can relate to tipping an ice-cold beer back, just NOT IN THE TUB!  Hot water,  ice-cold beer.  Good contrasts.  There is also a nice ambiguity with the floating bottles. Are they sanitized in the soapy water, or are they just empties? That’s funny.

And Rick did a wonderful job performing one of the most difficult feats you can ask a model to do-he smiled while drinking from a bottle! Try it some time. Not so easy!

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lacin.com/2011/11/18/humor-can-be-funny-and-is-definitely-better-than-boring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

